Second Ubuntu Yakkety Yak test rebuilds (all components, all architectures, Linaro-GCC)

[Matthias Klose]

The second test rebuild of Yakkety Yak was started on September 16 for all
architectures, all components (main component and seeded packages mostly
finished, unseeded packages still building).

Results (please also look at the superseded builds) can be found at

http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/test-rebuild-20160916-yakkety.html

Additional build failures for packages in yakkety-proposed (not yet in yakkety)
can be found at http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/

Please help fixing the build failures.


Another test rebuild using the Linaro-GCC 6 as the default (planning the
defaults change around the end of October) can be found at

http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/test-rebuild-20160916-linaro-yakkety.html

The corresponding compiler can be found in the ubuntu-toolchain-r/test PPA.

Matthias

[Nish Aravamudan]

Responding for ubuntu-server packages...

Post by Matthias Klose
The second test rebuild of Yakkety Yak was started on September 16 for all
architectures, all components (main component and seeded packages mostly
finished, unseeded packages still building).
Results (please also look at the superseded builds) can be found at
http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/test-rebuild-20160916-yakkety.html

cinder, nova, nova-lxd, python-eventlet, python-taskflow should all be
handled by packages in -proposed by the openstack team. Thanks to them!

libewebp and memcached still have undetermined cause on armhf -- need to
find time next week to debug live, I think.

llvm-toolchain-3.6 has a build-fix in debian, but it then still fails to
pass two tests, still investigating.

python-cffi on ppc64el, reproduced, debugging live.

python-docutils should be fixed on the next test rebuild, as it was a
bug in xml-core. This will probably fix a few other build failures with
the same signature ("dh_installxmlcatalogs: Unexpected debhelper version
format").

xen is fixed per Stefan Bader in the -proposed version.

Post by Matthias Klose
Additional build failures for packages in yakkety-proposed (not yet in yakkety)
can be found at http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/

I believe juju team will need to look at the juju-core failure and will
ping the lxc folks on that failure.

Thanks,
Nish